Customer Service 1 (888) 261-2693
Please enter Search keyword. Advanced Search

Is the Fed Boosting Stocks? The Numbers Don't Lie...

By Jason Goepfert, SentimenTrader

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Anyone who's read my SentimenTrader advisory over the past nine years knows I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
Out of the approximately 2,500 comments I've posted, I've alluded to market manipulation probably fewer than half a dozen times.
Whenever I hear about "evil investment banks" or "politicized Fed bankers" or "automatic trading algorithms," my eyes kind of glaze over, I huff, "get over it," and I concentrate on finding market anomalies to trade.
But I'll be perfectly honest here – I'm starting to crack. You see, my job is to analyze market data. I've done it for more than a decade. And the trading patterns I'm seeing during the day, especially lately, are not what we've typically seen in the past.
Last Wednesday's trading session is a perfect example. We were seeing persistently weak readings in the NYSE TICK indicator (meaning more stocks last traded on a downtick than an uptick), and yet the S&P futures kept creeping higher at the same time. That is extraordinarily unusual.
I'm not going to spend my time looking at every tiny stock movement as evidence of "manipulators" at work. The market has always been manipulated by somebody – the story never changes, only the characters do.
But today I do want to touch on something that's getting a lot of attention, which is the latest announcement of Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO) by the Federal Reserve, found here. This is where the Fed announces, in general, what government securities it is going to buy and how much. Many are starting to believe these funds wind their way through the system and end up in the stock market.
I'm not going to pretend I have any great insight as to whether this is true, the actual mechanics of how it would work, or what other ways the Fed might be propping up stock prices. I'm just going to take the data at face value and see what impact it has had on stocks.
So let's use the Fed's data on POMO days to see if the S&P 500 had any tendency to rise on those days or immediately thereafter.
The table below shows the S&P's performance on days there were no POMO buys, and compares that to all POMO days, those greater than and less than $3.5 billion, and then by the different types of bond purchases the Fed does. The data begins in August 2005. (Don't worry about focusing on all the numbers, I'll tell you what it all means just below the chart.)
One thing stands out pretty clear: The market was more likely to rally, and with a significantly higher return, after POMO days than after non-POMO days.
Looking at returns one month later, if there were no POMO operations, the S&P was positive 58% of the time with a median return of -0.3%. But if the Fed was active on a particular day, a month later, the S&P was up 78% of the time with a return of +2.6%.
That's a stark difference.
And the larger the operation, the better the S&P did a month later.
Looking at the various types of operations, the most impact seemed to be with Coupon Purchases (listed as "Outright Treasury Coupon Purchase" on the Fed's website). And the most positive of all were large Coupon Purchases – if the operation was greater than $3.5 billion on those days, a month later, the S&P 500 was positive 89% of the time (33 out of 37 days) with a median return of +3.4%.
Looking at the Fed's website, it looks like that's exactly what we're in store for during the coming weeks.
It's exceptionally difficult for me to rely on data like this for trading decisions. Citing conspiracy theories for the basis of trades smacks of desperation. But it's hard to argue with the data above, and the unusual way in which the market has been behaving.
Whether you believe in Fed conspiracies or not, the numbers here don't lie. The government has an unlimited amount of money at its disposal if it wants to boost asset prices. Keep this in mind when trading over the coming months.
Jason Goepfert

Further Reading:

Our "sentiment guru" Jason Goepfert tracks dozens of sentiment indicators, watching for unusual extremes and solid trading setups. When he finds one, we pay close attention.
Just days before the March 2009 bottom, for example, he called for a big rally in stocks. In 2008, Jason told DailyWealth readers about his "Dumb Money" approach. And Steve used that indicator to predict a drop days before the April 2010 peak. Long story short, when Jason speaks, we suggest you listen.

Market Notes


You could call our chart of the week "the stock rally that wasn't."
Everyone knows stocks have enjoyed a big run since the beginning of September. The benchmark S&P 500 Index has gained nearly 12%. But try to take the gains you've made in stocks and accumulate more "real stuff" like gold, food, or energy, and you'll find it wasn't much of a stock rally at all...
You see, while stocks have rallied, grains like corn and soybeans have rallied as well... oil has rallied (from $75 per barrel to $83)... gasoline has rallied... and of course, "real money," gold, has exploded in price... running up $125 per ounce since September. These assets are all running higher in response to the enormous recent decline in the U.S. dollar.
This week's chart displays the six-month performance of the S&P 500 in terms of gold. You'll note that in terms of "real money," the S&P's September rally isn't much of one at all. The Federal Reserve's "E-Z-Credit" currency-debasement program is erasing the dollar value of gains almost as fast as we can make 'em!

The stock rally that wasn't: Stocks in terms of gold

Stat of the week


Percentage gain in the price of corn in the last two months. Used as livestock feed and in a myriad of packaged food and beverage products, corn is the foundation of the U.S. food system.

In The Daily Crux

Recent Articles